the Mayor
Franco Miracles
Gaggiano City (MI)
SUBJECT:
comments / criticisms against the Municipal Council Decision No 47, 24.09.2008 - adoption PII ex Consorzio Agrario di Via Marconi. "
This committee consists of non-partisan and apolitical citizens spontaneously Gaggianesi, having as its President Mr. Sacchi as Coordinator and Mr. Silvano Gregori Tiziano, located in Gaggiano (MI), Via Marconi 16, the purpose of participation as regards the management and intervention programs in the area called "the former Agricultural Cooperative in Via Marconi, and is the bearer of proposals for upgrading and balanced development, sustainable and participatory for the area in question.
The comments are presented arise as a result of the adoption of PII in question indicated that it does not take into account some of the environmental, urban planning and architecture, although the area Gaggianese and especially that of the nearest tower to enjoy the soothing, peculiarities other adjacent communities.
Unfortunately, the PII in question, which assumes the character of variation of the PRG and PTCP provides for remodeling a building equal to a total of mc. 15,500 (of which 14,700 cubic meters.'s New residence and 800 cubic meters. Of new commercial space) in front of 12,000 cubic meters. possible under the current PRG, given the lack of PGT. In the same building is provided a height of 25.75 m, with a total of 60 new apartments, 100 boxes for its residents, about 35-40 public car parks, including the existing 18, in front of railway station, a new link road Via IV Novembre p.za by S. invention, etc..
First observation:
in 2005 the City's planning department Pezzotti Maurizio letter prot. 3753 of 22.03.2005 made some preliminary remarks to the former owner of Consorzio Agrario Provinciale, saying that "property must be provided up to 4 levels above the" no "to maintain the existing building" and to replace it "free space on the front Via Marconi, "The target should be checked with the commercial market investigation" and, "with regard to the volume, in principle, ... 12,000 mc.."
CRITICAL Committee RON7 plans:
because today with the resolution indicated in the subject in just over three years, the same assessor upset everything? Where
been made (and if done with whom) the market investigation, as they provide 800 cubic meters of tertiary business?
Why the increase in volume of 12,000 cubic meters. to 15,500 cubic meters.? If it is for the "dynamic planning as required by the modern times" as the engineer said. Fugazza in the City Council of 23.09.2008 is true that we earn the construction companies, workers who receive work, the municipal administration has an economic benefit of 600,000 to 650,000 €, but the citizens who now live around there that have benefits? It 'obvious that the building will be built, due to high volumes, in our opinion would not fit in with the surrounding urban fabric and existing in the chosen area. The project structure is too large and too insensitive to ecological issues because it seems you do not use renewable energy sources.
E 'can only "monetization" is the most functional? In each case the changes are not explained!
Second observation:
E 'certain that within the area there are no farmers' cooperative 2 tanks of the age of 50 years in which they were paid oil and diesel fuel. These tanks still existing have been damaged over time and needed a number of waterproofing to prevent the removal of liquids out of possible danger of pollution of the aquifer that is below about 1.5 m. from the base of the tanks.
CRITICAL Committee RON7 plans:
unexpectedly with this Administration determines (signed by the Mayor F. Miracles) of 22 September about the PII has excluded from the SEA, despite the fact that, at least, the possible danger of pollution of the water seem exist.
In this connection it is recalled that the existing Local Rules of Hygiene Type, wants all the divested assets must first be cleared for it to be declared healthy area on which you'll want to build. So
formally asks the mayor to take action jointly OU ARPA, so ask at the time the construction company, that all the procedures and surveys to check the pollution of soil and subsoil, through analysis and coring.
THIRD OBSERVATION: PARKING, TRAFFIC AND ROAD '
In the project presented is the lack of construction new public car parks or rather, where it is spoken, you do look like new and existing along the Piazza IV Novembre, and those already under construction on behalf of the FRY (used for the sole use of mobility steel / rubber) and already fully implemented by PTCP.
are not assessed the impacts on the environment, noise and air pollution. The only exit road is the traffic light on Via S. CRITICISM of the European invention
RON7 plans:
the public car parks or public interest are absent and there must also be the inner former Consortium area as there will be a commercial area.
not been without careful analysis, if not at least superficially, on the expected "load of users" who will come to pass in the same neighborhood in terms of traffic and traffic conditions.
The route of the new road that does not appear to be totally or build the private lotizzante or the City, much less "available", as required by the existing regional legislation and in any case going to end in cul de sac. " It will not be any change in a decisive phase of the traffic light intersection of Via S. invention which is capable of disposing of the vehicle traffic in input / output, increased (on a calculation of 50-60 flats) of at least 100 vehicles in more. Although
edificatoria area is located 30 meters from the railway line, near the center of the country, it is the opinion of this Committee that this area remains covered by the provincial PTCP because located just 30 meters from the railway line Milano-Mortara. In this regard it is noted that this Committee has been called the Councillor P. Means of the Province of Milan to report about it.
would also be desirable that before authorizing the construction of these buildings, the City Council is active in a decisive manner in the province for it to be built that bridge (tangenzialina west) linking Rosate and connection along the SS 494, whose load Car currently flows constantly along the local streets of the City.
fourth point: the agricultural consortium
not mentioned any possibility of upgrading the structure of the Agricultural Cooperative
CRITICAL Committee RON7 plans:
interest should be the same Town Council to recognize the current consortium structure or historical interest ethno anthropological (the "preservation order"), as in that of Corbetta (MI).
edificatoria fact the current structure is as follows: No
Building a parallel to the Via Marconi, built at the beginning of 1900 for dairy and then used for the purposes of the Consortium offices (ground floor) and residential (Upstairs);
No 1 + silo tower loading bays at 10 (with a variety of cells), built in the early '20s because of the activities of neo-Consortium for storage and processing of wheat, corn and barley;
No A shed used for warehouse use built in the early 80s.
There's more than another type of protection to the "monumental": the "landscape protection." In this
inertia of municipal administration, the Committee plans RON7 is activated at the Superintendent responsible for you to safeguard checks it. Because this administration does not think in advance to safeguard it?
FIFTH OBSERVATION: WITH PAYMENT OF EURO REVENUE 100,000
The procedural steps relating to the PII are basically four: the adoption of PII - remarks on PII - approval of PII - Agreement with the construction company.
CRITICAL Committee RON7 plans:
the four stages are well marked in time. Currently, there is in the second and you know that the company has already paid Elle Ltd, on account of secondary infrastructure costs (order of collection No 2609 of 19.06.2008) the amount advanced to € 100,000 (centomila/00) .
First of all it is right to say that this Administration has evaluated this project in the city "Elle Ltd. ", which does not include the necessary public parking, only moved by his great desire to build as soon as possible (the facts that occurred from June to now confirm this). But what is most important is to note that any amount is legally Eligible only in the fourth stage that is only when carried out preventive steps, you arrive at the convention. Would it be a glaring oversight, it is of the opinion that the municipal administration must necessarily return that sum to the company Elle srl. In the absence of what this committee says that after 15 days, with no evidence of repayment of € 100,000, will be activated at the Prosecutor's Office criminal jurisdiction to determine whether that income is a criminal offense under the current rules of the Criminal Code, resulting in demand for criminal confiscation of the sum itself, since it would be unlawfully acquired.
SIXTH NOTE: LEGALITY OF SCREEN '
The PII has been adopted by regional law, Law 12/2005.
CRITICAL Committee RON7 plans:
violations can be recognized in Articles 90 paragraphs 1 and 4, 91 paragraph 1 and 92 paragraphs 3 and 4 of Law 12/2005.
fact: the PII adopted is totally devoid of analysis of the loads of users, lack of any proposal that concerns the public interest (read parking public), is adopted by changing the objective of upgrading farmers' cooperative. Also: the adoption of PII does not substantiate analytically because of the increase in volume from 12,000 to 15,500 cubic meters and includes a new road link between private and that no municipality has the total "availability".
As above it is therefore illegitimate, in our opinion, the procedure adopted for the PII
CONCLUSIONS
If the individual clearly pursues their interests (economic) and not always be expected to be sensitive to the values \u200b\u200bof environmental protection, quite another responsibility of the government which has the task of meeting the needs of today's current citizens.
The residential and commercial structures in the opinion of this committee is a high cost in terms of sustainability and consumption of mineral resources, which is not fully compensated by the proposal, lacking in terms of innovation and sensitivity to environmental issues.
Since the Statute of the City of Gaggiano "direct participation", recognizing the central role of citizens, would be very helpful if they were organized at different times of public participation, useful to improve the project and the limitation of adverse effects, regardless already in advance as "clacque" of some This political group in the City Council.
For all the foregoing, the Committee requests that the plans RON7 PII in question is not finally approved, considering that a serious reflection on the above, and calls for an appropriate place of common sense, given that another cast cement goes further depleting this coveted territory.
Unfortunately, it is commonplace that that culture and that attention to the territory, there is no trace.
You want to build new buildings, he is "building" is often the exception plan, but there is no planning permission, planning to do, you know, it means designing and building the city, promoting their harmonious development, not just new buildings meet the needs of the economy forgetting those of the community and the land, intended as a comprehensive set of residents, as users and environment. It appeals to the sensitivity of this administration are prevented by this action because a further affront to the city and, above all, leads to an overall deterioration in the quality of live in a neighborhood already cemented. The Committee
RON7 plans back then to ask the reasons why it does not expect the preparation of the TMP before approving plans and options that should precisely be governed by the new planning instrument.
is required to be heard as described above.
Sincerely
The President of the NO7piani:
Dr. Silvano. Sacchi
The Coordinator of the Committee NO7piani: Tiziano
Gregori
Caggiano, 10.11.2008
COMMITTEE PLANS RON7
Cell 347.9111733
http://www.blogger.com/no7piani @ gmail.com
http: / / no7piani.blogspot.com / ___________________________________________________________________
0 comments:
Post a Comment